By National Research Council, Policy and Global Affairs, Technology, and Economic Policy Board on Science, Committee on Competing in the 21st Century: Best Practice in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives, Charles W. Wessner
Many of the coverage dialogue approximately stimulating innovation has involved in the federal point. This research makes a speciality of the numerous task on the kingdom point, with the target of enhancing the public's knowing of key coverage recommendations and exemplary practices. in line with a chain of workshops and meetings that introduced jointly policymakers in addition to leaders of and academia in a pick out variety of states, the learn highlights a wealthy number of coverage projects underway on the country and nearby point to foster wisdom established progress and employment. might be what distinguishes this attempt on the country point is such a lot of all of the excessive measure of pragmatism. working out of necessity, innovation rules on the country point usually contain profiting from latest assets and recombining them in new methods, forging cutting edge partnerships between universities, and executive firms, becoming the ability base, and making an investment within the infrastructure to increase new applied sciences and new industries. a lot of those tasks are being guided via leaders from the personal quarter and universities.
The target of Best Practices in nation and local Innovation projects: Competing within the twenty first Century is to not do an empirical evaluate of the inputs and outputs of assorted country courses. neither is it to guage which courses are stronger. certainly, the various impressive successes, reminiscent of the Albany nanotechnology cluster, characterize a bounce of management, funding, and sustained dedication that has had impressive leads to an that's actively pursued via many nations. The study's aim is to demonstrate the methods taken via numerous hugely different states as they confront the expanding demanding situations of worldwide festival for the industries and jobs of at the present time and the next day.
Read or Download Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century PDF
Similar industrial technology books
Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain process is the fundamental reference for pro engineers, collage professors and scholars utilizing, instructing, or studying FDTD recommendations to Maxwell's equations. The publication presents a entire instructional of FDTD idea and strategies in addition to info at the most up-to-date FDTD tools for the effective layout of key digital elements resembling antennas for instant communications units, high-speed electronic and microwave circuits, and built-in optics.
Liquid-Phase Epitaxy (LPE) is a method utilized in the majority development of crystals, as a rule in semiconductor production, wherein the crystal is grown from a wealthy answer of the semiconductor onto a substrate in layers, every one of that's shaped by way of supersaturation or cooling. a minimum of 50% of progress within the optoelectronics zone is presently focussed on LPE.
In response to the author’s wide-ranging adventure as a robotic consumer, provider and advisor, Implementation of robotic structures will enable you technique using robots on your plant or facility armed with the precise wisdom base and wisdom of serious components take into consideration. This ebook starts off with the fundamentals of common functions and robotic features sooner than overlaying all levels of profitable robotic integration.
- Multilayered low temperature cofired ceramics (LTCC) technology
- Multivariate Statistical Process Control with Industrial Application
- The Piping Guide: For the Design and Drafting of Industrial Piping Systems
- Computer Aided and Integrated Manufacturing Systems: Volume 2 Intelligent Systems Technologies
Additional resources for Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century
33 Virginia was the first to adopt this program in the 1960s, with Ohio serving as the second adopter in 1983. They were followed by Tennessee, North Carolina, Louisiana, Georgia, and Arizona. See Maryann P. Feldman, Lauren Lanahan and Iryna Lendel, Experiments in the Laboratories of Democracy: State Scientific Capacity Building, Economic Development Quarterly, forthcoming. 34 “Georgia’s Technology Scholars Get a Tip of the Hat from Miller”, The Atlanta JournalConstitution, April 15, 1998; “Research Group Supportive of UGA Scientists,” Atlanta BannerHerald September 26, 2010.
20 David C. Mowery, Chapter 29—“Military R&D and Innovation,” in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation Volume 2, Elsevir, 2010, pp. 1219-1256. 21 See NSTC, “National Network for Manufacturing Innovation: A Preliminary Design,” Washington, DC: The White House, January 2013. S. industry and academia to solve industry-relevant problems. ” 22 See Susan Crawford, National Research Council, Growing Innovation Clusters for American Prosperity: Summary of a Symposium, C. Wessner, Rapporteur, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011, p.
Every state supports a system of public universities, institutions that along with their private counterparts have been at the forefront of innovation-driven economic development for well over a century. 13 The states likewise control the provision of public K-12 education, which depending on its quality, can foster the development of an adult work force with the skill levels necessary to support an innovation-driven economy. S. advantages in universities may be eroding. 14 This has been followed in recent times by additional cuts to federal support for university R&D.